VN0015 - m and Q Values for FDS

Technical Notes

Author Jade Vande Kamp

Abstract

Download PDF

This tech note defines the function of the m and Q values when creating a fatigue damage spectrum (FDS) and using the FDS for test profile generation and test acceleration.

Question

What is the purpose of the m and Q values when using the FDS software? What values of m and Q can I use as a starting point for the test development of a mixed composition component? How can I determine a more specific value?

Answer

The m and Q parameters are relevant during the time-history analysis portion of the FDS. To perform FDS time-history analysis, the engineer uploads one or multiple field-recorded waveforms, and the software converts each time-history file to an FDS. The software can then create an acceleration spectral density (ASD) test profile from one or multiple FDS files. Optionally, the engineer can accelerate the test duration of the test profile. The m and Q values affect how the software analyzes these files.

Q Value

The Q value determines the spread of damage throughout the frequency spectrum of the resulting ASD. A low Q value spreads damage amongst neighboring frequencies, and a high Q concentrates the damage. A higher Q value uses narrower filters resulting in sharper peaks, while a lower Q results in a wider filter and a smoother spectrum with less detail.

If the Q value of the product is unknown, a good starting value is 10. A Q of 10 outputs an FDS—thus, an ASD—with a reasonable filtering and frequency response.

To determine a more specific value for Q, perform a simple sine sweep through the operating range of the product to find the primary resonance. The Q value for the FDS should be the Q of the primary resonance.

m Value

The m value is an exponent in the FDS equation, so it plays a larger role than Q, which is a divisor in the equation (Henderson & Piersol, 1995). MIL-STD-810H provides some direction for defining an initial m value when the S-N curve or m value of a product is unknown.

“The value of ‘m’ is generally some proportion of the negative reciprocal of the slope of the S-N curve, known as the fatigue strength exponent and designated as ‘-1/b.’ Typical values of ‘m’ are 80 percent of ‘-1/b’ for random waveshapes, and 60 percent of ‘-1/b’ for sinusoidal waveshapes. Historically, a value of m = 7.5 has been used for random environments, but values between 5 and 8 are commonly used. A value of 6 is commonly used for sinusoidal environments.”

The m value affects the processes of FDS generation and test compression differently. A number between 5 and 8 is a good starting point, but the engineer should consider this difference when selecting a value. The engineer must also account for the type of random data imported. Typically, real-world data is non-Gaussian. If the input waveform is Gaussian (kurtosis = 3), the resulting PSD is the same regardless of the m and Q values.

The following sections describe the effects of the m value on FDS generation and test time compression with non-Gaussian data.

FDS Generation with Non-Gaussian Data

For non-Gaussian data, a higher m puts more weight on peak values than a lower m, meaning the high kurtosis peaks play a greater factor in FDS generation. The resulting test will have a higher acceleration, velocity, and displacement, making it more conservative than the imported time-history file. Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the resulting PSD profile values for the same time-history file with different m values.

m value RMS (G) Vel. RMS (in/s) Disp. pk-pk (in)
8 3.487 10.78 1.147
4 2.524 8.703 1.015

Table 1. Comparison of acceleration, velocity, and displacement for different m values.

FDS test settings where m=8 and Q=10

FDS test settings where m=4 and Q=10

Test Time Compression with Non-Gaussian Data

The m value has the opposite effect for test time compression with a non-Gaussian input waveform. With a higher m, an increase in time reduction has less of an effect on the increase in PSD amplitude. Compare Figure 3 and Figure 4. When m = 8 at a 2x time compression, there is an approximate 10% increase in the profile GRMS. When m=4 at a 2x time compression, the increase is 20%. For time compression, failure is more likely when using a lower m value.

FDS test settings where m=8, Q=10, and test time compression is 2x

FDS test settings where m=4, Q=10, and test time compression is 2x

Determining a Specific m Value

The accuracy of the m value can significantly improve the accuracy of FDS generation. The process to determine the m value is more involved than that of determining Q. To accurately determine m, an S-N graph (stress to number of cycles) is required (Wöhler, 1870).

One method of producing the S-N graph is to repeatedly test a product to failure at varying GRMS levels and record the time required to reach failure. With enough failure runs recorded, it is possible to back-calculate a strong approximation of the S-N curve by:

  1. Plotting the data points on a log-log graph
  2. Plotting the power-law model of the data

The slope of the power-law model is equal to b. From b, it is possible to calculate the value of m.

(1)   \begin{equation*} m=-1/b\times SF \end{equation*}

SF is based on the recommendations of MIL-STD-810H:

“The value of ‘m’ is strongly influenced by the material S-N curve, but fatigue life is also influenced by the surface finish, the treatment, the effect of mean stress correction, the contributions of elastic and plastic strain, the waveshape of the strain time history, etc. Therefore, the value of ‘m’ is generally some proportion of the negative reciprocal of the slope of the S-N curve, known as the fatigue strength exponent and designated as ‘-1/b.’ Typical values of ‘m’ are 80 percent of ‘-1/b’ for random waveshapes, and 60 percent of ‘-1/b’ for sinusoidal waveshapes.”

Vibration Research has an m calculation tool that will plot the GRMS vs. time to failure data, determine the slope of the S-N curve, and calculate the m based on the input data.

FDS Calculator (Excel)

Adding Kurtosis

Adding kurtosis to the PSD reduces the effect of m due to the decrease in overall GRMS caused by the addition of higher kurtosis peaks. Although the generated FDS accounts for the damaging kurtosis peaks in the original time-history file, adding kurtosis to the resulting PSD can be helpful. Adding kurtosis lowers the test’s overall GRMS requirement while maintaining a damage profile equivalent to the imported time-history file. This action can be particularly beneficial when an amplifier can handle the peaks but is unable to maintain the continuous demand of the PSD.

Conclusion

Overall, if the m and Q values for a product are unknown, an initial recommended starting point would be:

  • m=6 or 8 (sinusoidal or random)
  • Q=10

These values create a conservative FDS with reasonable filtering and frequency resolution. As more data is accumulated, these values can be adjusted to accurately estimate a product’s m and Q values, even if it is a mixed composition component.

For instructions on how to create an FDS test, see Creating a Fatigue Damage Spectrum Test.

References

United States Department of Defense. 2008. Department of Defense Test Method Standard MIL-STD-810G: Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests. https://www.atec.army.mil/publications/Mil-Std-810G/MIL-STD-810G.pdf.

Henderson, G.R. and A.G. Piersol. “Fatigue Damage Related Descriptor for Random Vibration Test Environments.” Sound and Vibration (1995): 20-24.

How Can We Help You?

Contact Us