SAE J2380™ is a test standard issued by SAE International® for the vibration testing of electric vehicle batteries. Its test procedure qualifies the durability of an electric vehicle battery module/pack before production.
J2380 provides a vibration breakpoint and schedule for a random vibration test. However, the scope of the document includes the following caveat:
“Preferably, a specific vibration durability profile should be developed based on actual vehicle measurements for the specific electric vehicle application.”
A custom test profile will more closely replicate the electric vehicle’s end-use environment, which depends on the target customer and sales region, amongst other factors. A more accurate test profile improves confidence in the test results.
The standard’s provided test levels are meant to simulate “long-term, road-induced vibration and shock,” meaning a lifetime of use, and J2380 describes the process of determining its values. We can replicate the process described in J2380 to develop a specific vibration durability profile.
As an example, we will use recorded data from a Cadillac Lyriq to build an SAE J2380 random test profile.
Test Levels
The J2380 vibration profile is an accelerated test that simulates a battery’s lifetime of use. A custom test profile must factor in all the vehicle’s likely end-use environments and weigh them to develop a test with cumulative exposure.
Recording Data
To achieve J2380’s defined tests, the standards committee used “rough-road measurements” recorded at likely mounting points for the battery. For the Lyriq, data were collected from:
- Front inverter
- Front drive unit mount
- Front lower mount
- Front chassis lower
- Front battery
- Rear drive unit
- Driver, bottom, and passenger
- Rear drive unit mount
- Rear battery
The test procedure calls for a shaker test in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral axes, either one axis at a time or on a triaxial shaker. Data were collected on the Lyriq in the three axes using triaxial accelerometers. The vibration at each axis may differ, so it is not sufficient to record data in one axis and use the resulting test profile for all three.
The Lyriq was driven on various conditions, such as gravel and highway. Engineers should consider all conditions the battery may experience, including extreme outliers.
Data Analysis
The recorded data from the Lyriq were imported in the ObserVIEW analysis software. First, data from two ObserVR1000 devices were combined. GoPro video was referenced to confirm the data files were synchronized. Then, the engineers performed integrity checks on the data. Finally, a high-pass filter with a 2Hz corner frequency was applied.
Test Development
On average, an electric vehicle is driven over some road conditions more frequently than others. As such, data from each condition needs to be weighed appropriately in the test profile.
Sensor mounted on front battery location.
J2380 briefly explains its enveloping technique, where weighted values were combined to develop a cumulative test profile. The standards committee approximated an envelope of cumulative exposure, where the envelope corresponded to approximately 100,000 miles of use at the 90th percentile, meaning that 90% of instances are no more damaging than the test profile.
To develop a similar test in VibrationVIEW, the combined data was imported into the software and processed with the Fatigue Damage Spectrum (FDS) feature. The data measured at the front battery location in the lateral (LA) axis was used to develop a test profile.
FDS Test
Fatigue Damage was selected as the test method (New Test > Fatigue Damage).
Under the Import tab, the parameters were set as:
- File Units: G
- m: 4
- Q: 8
- 4 Hz to 2000 Hz at 1/24 Octave
To add the file, select the file icon button. Select the Scan File button.
Fatigue Damage import method in VibrationVIEW FDS.
The engineers wanted the envelope to correspond to approximately 200,000 miles. Test acceleration depends on the shaker table and appropriate acceleration levels.
As the waveform distance was 32.7 miles, 6117 repetitions (or passes) would achieve the desired value. The duration of the waveform was 0:44:11:271 (44.2586111111111 minutes), so the desired repetition time was 4512:09:55.450 (6117*44.2586111111111). 4512:09:55.450 was set as the target life, and the test duration was set to 20:00:00.
When the Kurtosion® Time Compression was selected, the gRMS adjusted from 0.1422 gRMS to 0.1306 gRMS.
Fatigue Damage import with Kurtosion time compression.
The software calculated a breakpoint table based on the measured data and test settings.
Note: Although the recorded data file had multiple channels, this example profile selected one channel. FDS Import includes the option to assign different target life values to each channel (or file) to weigh the effect of each on the lifetime of the product. The technical note, How to Create a Fatigue Damage Spectrum (FDS) Test, discusses the option of importing multiple files.
The shock response spectra (SRS) of the J2380 profile and field data profile were compared to confirm that the test was not overly severe.
SRS comparison of J2380 profile and field data profile.